The clues behind the bug, in the same place.
A screenshot shows where something went wrong. Diagnostics add what the browser saw. Layerdock keeps console and network details close to the page, pin, and conversation.
Capture the details that are easy to miss.
Bring relevant console messages and network activity into the review. These clues can help explain why a page behaved differently from what the reviewer expected.
Start from the same evidence.
Keep the page URL, selector, screenshot, and available traces close to the report. Developers can begin with the same evidence the reviewer saw, rather than asking them to recreate the issue from memory.
Keep technical context readable.
The person reporting an issue should not need to translate browser output into a developer's language. Keep the observation clear, and let the supporting details travel with it.
Pass the context into the next step.
Use MCP to make the feedback and browser context available to a coding agent. The agent gets a clearer starting point; your team stays in control of what changes.
Make the next
website review easier.
Give your team and clients one clear place to see the issue, capture the context, and share the fix.
Frequently asked questions
What to know about LayerDock, privacy, and getting started.
What diagnostics does LayerDock include?
Console messages, network requests and system details (browser, operating system and viewport), recorded with every pin. They are captured on every plan; reading them is part of the Agency plan, so upgrading reveals the full history.
Is a screenshot enough to report a bug?
Often not. A screenshot shows the symptom: a blank panel, a broken layout. The console error or failed request behind it is what a developer needs to find the cause, and that is what diagnostics keep with the pin.
Can a coding agent use these details?
Yes, through the LayerDock MCP server. On Agency the agent receives the console and network trace with each pin; on Pro it receives the comment, element, screenshot and page URL.